關注本土權益,光復香港運動

[メソウサ]

http://fc-hk.net/?p=33

成龍新理論「日本的才會爆炸」「香港人才是蝗蟲」

中國電視機爆炸論乃成龍於2009年4月18日出席海南博鰲論壇時發表引起爭議的言論，當時他在分組會議被問對文化自由的看法時回應說，「自己對於到底是自由好，還是不自由好感到很矛盾，因為太自由了，就會像台灣和香港一樣，變得很混亂」，所以他慢慢覺得，「中國人還是需要被管的」。成龍又說，「自己如果要買電視機，一定會買日本製的，因為中國製的電視機會爆炸」。在評論三聚氰胺事件時他說，「一些偷雞摸狗的人，在產品加入許多對人體有害的成分。」成龍在會後補充，他認為台灣很亂，是指台灣的政治環境很亂，但強調現在台灣的政治已經好了一些。

而在事過五年的今天，成龍在接受大陸「超級訪問」中又道出了一些令人驚震的言論，首先成龍強調自己五年前「中國的會爆炸」是有根據的事實，因為當時中國社會太多無良奸商所致，但今天現在中國文明已經飛躍進步，中央嚴打貪污奸商，社會一片良好光明。相反經濟低迷的日本所生產的才容易爆炸，由於日本人的自大及自我感覺良好，這十多年來生產品質一直下降，以至到最後今天日本產出接近是零，大部份已交由中國所生產，除日本外如美國的iPhone韓國的Samsung等最前端科技產品，全無一例外地都在中國生產，證明了中國今時今日的霸主地位。

在談到身為香港人的成龍對香港看法，他說「我非常討厭今天的香港人，跟以前完全不一樣，智商低了不少，容易被外國勢力影響」「香港人喜歡說大陸人是蝗蟲，但偏偏忘記了自己也是大陸人。」當成龍被問及很多名人都會被問起的普選問題時，則認為中國人依然是需要被管的，就算外國也是需要被管的，所謂民主也是假像，因為人類本性沒有人管的話，就會亂得很恐怖，就像今天烏克蘭一樣。任何公司也要有領導和老闆，而老闆和領導可以由職員民選的嗎？我倒沒聽說過這回事。

成龍稱日後自己的發展方向會集中在中國，因為自己是中國人，這是無可否認的事實，他表示自己很少留意網路上的評論，原因是大多數都屬偏激和失實，真正理性的人是不會這樣做的，成龍也呼籲網民該少一點浪費時間，多作一些有意義的事情。

可能係潮文
不過呢條蟲事實上講咩都冇所謂鳥

[Rv250]

作者: 細路翔

想請問下miss我覺得我係中國人，但唔係愛黨既中國人得唔得架(拖走

miss: 可以研究, 不過是否中國人必須要喺中國人必須愛黨呢個框架上討論

[大山椒魚]

作者: メソウサ

http://fc-hk.net/?p=33

可能係潮文
不過呢條蟲事實上講咩都冇所謂鳥

成龍大師又洩露國家機密

不是說好國家是屬於人民的嗎?
人民的好公僕何時變成老闆了

[david]

作者: メソウサ

http://fc-hk.net/?p=33

可能係潮文
不過呢條蟲事實上講咩都冇所謂鳥

呢條虫好似唔記得佐自己身份証上面個名係咩。

不過，可能佢已經改佐個泡菜名都未定。

[Dyhalt Rushifar]

任何公司也要有領導和老闆，而老闆和領導可以由職員民選的嗎？我倒沒聽說過這回事。

叫佢去孫文墳前講一次，話唔定可以見到國賊復活

[J+1]

http://thehousenews.com/society/%E8%.../#.UxfYHcFus0M

廣東話版聖經,我都想睇下
由手機版發出

[真!DC]

"成龍稱日後自己的發展方向會集中在中國"
this’s the story
由手機版發出

[Rance]

作者: david

呢條虫好似唔記得佐自己身份証上面個名係咩。

不過，可能佢已經改佐個泡菜名都未定。

下,你同呢個三姓家奴講名

[真!DC]

http://hk.mobi.yahoo.com/story/?key=...s&ctg=featured
可能真係有人專登唔答
但就係冇人知香港大多數人都唔識普通話嗎?
由手機版發出

[sugihara]

作者: 真!DC

http://hk.mobi.yahoo.com/story/?key=...s&ctg=featured
可能真係有人專登唔答
但就係冇人知香港大多數人都唔識普通話嗎?
由手機版發出

呢d真係睇教養
有次遇過個講野算斯文0既有錢大陸婆,雖然開頭用普通話,但後來見我講得麻麻地都識夾硬用d唔咸唔淡0既廣東話問路...
講野粗魯果d就真係多謝都唔會講

btw一碟燒味飯個價夠食隔離兩碗豚王真係sosad

[真!DC]

要食百幾二百蚊個飯就唔會去茶餐廳
我試過比普通話問路我用廣東話加手指答
勉強聽倒但唔識講
由手機版發出

[sugihara]

http://www.openrice.com/restaurant/sr2.htm?shopid=5346
data仲係$40以下
不過呢幾條街d舖死得就死,都無咩好講啦......

[david]

作者: 真!DC

http://hk.mobi.yahoo.com/story/?key=...s&ctg=featured
可能真係有人專登唔答
但就係冇人知香港大多數人都唔識普通話嗎?
由手機版發出

自我澎漲就係咁O架啦，佢講殘廢話，就全世界都要識講殘廢話，否則就係唔尊重囉。

要去澳門就快O的，好行。

[Dyhalt Rushifar]

作者: david

自我澎漲就係咁O架啦，佢講殘廢話，就全世界都要識講殘廢話，否則就係唔尊重囉。

要去澳門就快O的，好行。

…你打晒在下想講既，在下打咩好…

[Pandahahaha]

作者: sugihara

呢d真係睇教養
有次遇過個講野算斯文0既有錢大陸婆,雖然開頭用普通話,但後來見我講得麻麻地都識夾硬用d唔咸唔淡0既廣東話問路...
講野粗魯果d就真係多謝都唔會講

btw一碟燒味飯個價夠食隔離兩碗豚王真係sosad

說穿了都是香港人不包容，又自負，中國是現在各國商家要想打入的市場，現在別人帶來商機給我們，我們卻不好好掌握，學好普通話，實在有違香港人[ 搵食姐 犯法呀 ] 原則

所以我十分支持廢除廣東話

[メソウサ]

作者: david

呢條虫好似唔記得佐自己身份証上面個名係咩。

不過，可能佢已經改佐個泡菜名都未定。

又唔駛咁上心
Source個網出名信佢一成雙目失明

[メソウサ]

http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/realti...40307/52257643

梁振英：旅客多令白領食午飯要排隊等

正在北京的特首梁振英，昨日接受內地媒體《中央人民廣播電台》專訪時，再次談到旅客增長問題。梁振英指出，香港人對各種各樣的服務效率要求較高，故旅客人數增長太快，確實造成一些壓力，「比如中午吃飯的時候，本來不必排隊，現在我們有些白領，吃飯要在餐廳門口排隊等等」。

梁振英重申，要解決問題，就要擴大旅客接待容量，但強調中央政府和特區政府非常關注香港接待能力問題，例如有49個內地城市的居民，可以「個人遊」的方式來港旅遊，這個數字過去7年都沒有增加，顯示了中央政府考慮到香港承受能力。

開心大發現

[凍檸茶]

報紙說, 多了自遊行, 建多了酒店, 所以未能建屋,
對嗎?
由手機版發出

[歌絲˙暮斯]

去酒店食飯咪得囉

[怪盜小G]

【now新聞台】正在北京參與全國人大會議的前保安局局長李少光認為，香港接待內地旅客能力是否足夠值得檢討，但暫時未有需要實施入境稅或自由行配額等措施，限制旅客來港。

李少光又指，向人大建議讓香港的青少年加入解放軍，認為有助提高他們對國家的認同感，否認是向內地獻媚，指自己是說實話。


去效忠支那共做隻賣港奴啦

[メソウサ]

http://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-...ainlander-hate

Hong Kong must have zero tolerance for anti-mainlander hate campaigns

John Young says there is no place in Hong Kong for the racial hatred seen during anti-mainlander protests, and we must amend our laws now to offer better protection or risk souring relations

Last month's protests against mainland visitors in Tsim Sha Tsui cast a shadow over Hong Kong's reputation as a world city and international tourist destination. Anti-mainland protesters targeted Chinese visitors in an extraordinary display of hatred and contempt opposite the shops on Canton Road.

The protesters derided the mainland visitors as Shina - a derogatory term akin to "Chink" that originated from Japanese use during the second world war. Protesters reviled the visitors as "locusts", likening their presence in Hong Kong to an insect plague. In a media-savvy touch, the protesters symbolically "exterminated" the visitors by spraying them with bottles labelled "locust insecticide". The "insecticide" later proved to be water but the toxic message was clear.

Eventually, some of the protesters resorted to pushing and shoving visitors outside the shops. Several shops closed their doors for fear of damage by the protesters, forcing many of the tourists to seek safety in the shops that remained open. None of this was brought on by anything any individual mainland visitor had said or done that day.

Tourism is an essential component of Hong Kong's economy. Last year, the city played host to more than 50 million tourists, over 70 per cent of whom came from the mainland. But the loss of tourist dollars is not the greatest danger presented by the wave of anti-mainland protests. The real danger is the polarisation of Hong Kong society and the transformation of the cultural and political dialogue between Hong Kong and the mainland from one of co-operation, competition and accommodation to one of contempt, conflict and annihilation.

Hong Kong-mainland relations are complex. Expanded tourism from the mainland was instrumental in lifting Hong Kong's economy out of the doldrums following the 2003 severe acute respiratory syndrome epidemic but many of the jobs created are in relatively low-paying retail and service areas. There is also the question of tourism's impact on commercial rents and the loss of neighbourhood businesses.

The divisive cultural environment makes rational discussion of these issues unlikely, and encourages a bigoted response to mainland visitors. The danger posed by these self-appointed guardians of "Hong Kong identity" is their ability to influence the tone of discussion of issues relating to mainland-Hong Kong relations, to shift the agenda from a discussion of accommodation and benefit to one of zero-sum cultural chauvinism and hatred.

Hate can transform societies. Civilised peoples commit otherwise unimaginable cruelties under its spell. Awareness of the danger posed by racial and religious hatred has led many nations to enact laws against "hate crimes" and "hate speech".

Hate crimes are criminal acts against an individual or group of individuals because of their race, colour, religion, ancestry, national origin, sexual orientation, gender or disability. In the US, hate crime statutes exist in both federal law and at state level. For example, California's criminal code prohibits interfering with another person's exercise of civil rights because of that person's national origin.

The exercise of civil rights includes such ordinary activities as walking on a public street and shopping. Thus, protesters' intimidation of mainland tourists would arguably be a crime had it taken place in California, and the perpetrators could be fined US$5,000 or jailed for up to a year.

Hong Kong prides itself as a city based on the rule of law and it makes sense to look to the law as an avenue for dealing with the rising tide of anti-mainland hatred and violence.

The closest thing that Hong Kong has to hate crime laws are the provisions of the International Convention on Civil and Political Rights and the Race Discrimination Ordinance.

The ordinance prohibits racial "vilification" and "harassment". Vilification is defined as activity "to incite hatred towards, serious contempt for, or severe ridicule of, another person or members of a class of persons on the ground of the race of the person or members of the class of persons", while harassment is defined as engaging "in unwelcome conduct … in circumstances in which a reasonable person … would have anticipated that the other person would be offended, humiliated or intimidated by that conduct".

The ordinance defines "race" as "the race, colour, descent or national or ethnic origin of the person". The protesters vilified and harassed visitors from the mainland when they subjected them to severe ridicule and contempt and incited hatred against the mainland "locusts" based solely upon their national origin.

The ordinance thus presents itself as an ideal means for protecting mainland visitors and residents from hate attacks, but for the fact that the attackers and victims legally share the same Chinese nationality. The ordinance contains no language explicitly requiring the perpetrator of discriminatory actions to be of a different race than the victims of the action, but some legal observers have expressed the view that its protections do not apply to discrimination against a national group by people of the same nationality.

During the drafting and adoption of the ordinance, the Home Affairs Bureau chose not to include "new arrivals" from the mainland within the groups explicitly covered in the law.

It is unclear if this omission would prohibit the Equal Opportunities Commission from taking action against the Tsim Sha Tsui protesters for harassment and vilification. However, the commission's chairman, Dr York Chow Yat-ngok, said recently it was possible to amend race hate laws to cover discrimination against members of the same ethnic group.

Hong Kong must say no to the dissemination of hatred and bigotry. The anti-mainland protesters' localism and intolerance are reminiscent of the hate campaigns that preceded the massacre of half a million Chinese in Indonesia in the 1960s or, indeed, of the rhetoric of hate and blame that dominated 1930s Germany. This rhetoric has no place in modern-day Hong Kong.

This is not to deny that contentious issues exist surrounding Hong Kong's relationship with the mainland. But it is precisely because these questions require intelligent and open debate that Hong Kong's political environment must continue to be based on the free and intelligent exchange of ideas rather than becoming mired in an environment tainted by hatred, bigotry and ignorance.

The government should immediately take action to extend the Race Discrimination Ordinance's protections to Chinese from the mainland. Hong Kong's survival as a place of tolerance and diversity may well depend on it.

John Young, a civil rights attorney, is the former associate director of the Journalism and Media Studies Centre at University of Hong Kong

呢條John Young指
1) 參與示威者用印有"滅蝗"噴霧噴向在場遊客
2) 示威者有跟遊客發生肢體碰撞

以上兩點當日根本冇發生過
嗜血傳媒亦一張相都拍唔到 (有的話仲唔炒上報兼拉人?)

紅早容許呢D冇經證實資訊見報
呃鬼佬香港有新納粹

[ALEX CHOW]

http://www.fyjs.cn/bbs/forum.php?mod...extra=page%3D1
憑什麼???你說呢??

[鈴蘭]

>這十多年來生產品質一直下降，以至到最後今天日本產出接近是零，大部份已交由中國所生產

:o)
你不如問下有邊間高級既商業大樓/建築會接受大陸既建材:o)
唔怕既你可以問埋點解要用日本喉/德國喉都唔用大陸喉:o)

[鈴蘭]

作者: sugihara

呢d真係睇教養
有次遇過個講野算斯文0既有錢大陸婆,雖然開頭用普通話,但後來見我講得麻麻地都識夾硬用d唔咸唔淡0既廣東話問路...
講野粗魯果d就真係多謝都唔會講

btw一碟燒味飯個價夠食隔離兩碗豚王真係sosad

>而在銅鑼灣經營飲食的港人方先生也喊貴，認為燒味飯50元一碟才算合理

頂你，正常人食既燒味飯30蚊架咋:o)
不過銅鑼灣不意外:o)

[Rv250]

作者: メソウサ

http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/realti...40307/52257643

開心大發現

佢眼中旅客帶嚟嘅壓力竟然係白領食飯要排隊